Bring forward a concern
People in a community or riding identify a specific issue, who it affects and what decision or change they seek. A proposal should have a named sponsor and a clear scope.
The Canadian Citizens Congress is being developed as a national civil society forum. Its proposed path connects local organizing, sourced evidence, respectful deliberation and a public record of recommendations and responses.
People in a community or riding identify a specific issue, who it affects and what decision or change they seek. A proposal should have a named sponsor and a clear scope.
Contributors collect primary sources, identify uncertainty and invite competing perspectives. A research finding is distinguished from a participant’s opinion or policy preference.
Participants examine options under published conduct and access rules. Feedback and changes are documented so people can see how a proposal developed.
Eligibility, notice, quorum, conflicts, ballot controls and appeals must be set by approved rules before any formal member decision is described as binding within the organization.
An approved recommendation should state the decision, supporting record, dissent or limitations, responsible follow-up and any response received. Publication requires a separate review.
Apply for a volunteer role in the Congress or local coordination.
Examine the draft governance package and the steps needed before adoption.
See published assembly notices, agendas, streams and approved records when available.
The Congress does not have parliamentary authority or the power to enact public law. The proposed one-member-one-vote civic framework does not itself grant corporate ownership or statutory membership. Binding ballots, fees and the first national assembly depend on approved governance, eligibility checks and operational readiness.